Well, here's one issue.
If you would equate "tin foil" to "conspiracy theories" then you'd be on more solid ground just as a starting position.
But when you link "tin foil" directly to proven conspiracies (all the harmful chemicals, known to cause illnesses, cancer, and even death itself, that are not only intentionally added, but are legally allowed to be added, and continued to be added and sold) then personally, your judgement comes into question.
To be compounded by the fact that, not only long after all the court battles, label changes, and settled lawsuits (for those prior to the those battles), but somehow New York manages to help their industry add YET MORE CHEMICALS to the already deadly concoction when they make the new FSC (fire safe cigarettes) a law. And worse still, help push that across the entire country, again under the guise of "protecting the public" for not having that one in half a million houses burning down, meanwhile harming literally millions more every single day, but this time not only the original chemical cocktail, but the new and improved "FSC death blend".
Yeah, I get questioning sources. Have no doubt of that. In fact, I question the reason you want to play Devil's Advocate for two sources that are not only known for, but renown for being biased sources of agenda with hugely slanted views.