This recipe is a copy of: ...?!

Let them all be public, why force to hide someone’s recipe?

What if I want a friend to follow me or want to share my recipes?

Better filtering and categorisation is the best solution imo

2 Likes

This is great. I’d love to hear more input on the matter - It’s not a small thing to be messing with :slight_smile:

3 Likes

I think or wish it appeared as if the recipe was public but only that person with the copy saw it, and when someone commented on that copy the comment attached to the original, and when someone shared a link to their copy the clicker would be directed to the original instead of the copy. Of course this would take so much programming it would be difficult to implement.
I Love ELR

1 Like

Forced default doesn’t mean you are unable to make it public. It simply means it starts out private and only goes public if you specify.

You can share private recipes, all you have to do is switch them to public.

It seems my recipes are already private by default. If I make them public there has been so many changes it’s really a new recipe, but even then I try to name the originator so folks can search and see the original recipe. What i see as undesirable is a copy of a recipe with 4.9 stars and a page full of comments, and looking back to the originators recipe and seeing lower ratings and fue comments.

2 Likes

That’s the default right now… It is working, but there are still people who make the adapted, unchanged version public for some reason.

You can also share private recipes with friends :slight_smile:

1 Like

Just wondering…
If this new thing comes about, if I make a recipe up, and it is the same ingredients as another recipe (un beknown to me), would I get a message come up telling me that the recipe I just made was the same as another already in the system (along with a link to it)? If so I like that idea a lot.
One other thing that needs (or should be) looked into and what has been attempted to be worked on is (yeah I know I keep harping on this)… the ingredient list. This new thing isn’t going to work well if someone just changes the ingredient from (FA) Fresh Cream to (FA) Cream Fresh or FA - Cream Fresh unless the system understands those are the same things.

3 Likes

That would allow the hooligans to slightly change their recipe in an attempt to include it into the database.
Their are some folks on the internet who will adapt/publish in an attempt to clog the database. I think its the same folks who put 25% cowboy blend into a recipe hoping to foul the system and get someone to actually try it. And the same individuals who keep downrating recipes just to affect the ratings, IMO the steps to quell their activity should be done behind the scene without the hooligans knowledge.
sorry for not making a lot of sense, i had surgery today and am recovering with a dose of pain pills and bush beer.

1 Like

I got to give this a like because…Busch Beer. It’s that, “I got 3 more days till payday” go to brew.

1 Like

You know what would be cool? When someone tries to make and adapted or identical recipe public and it won’t work. They get a warning message “we’re sorry but the recipe you are trying to make public is already published on ELR. You can only save this as a private recipe.” Then maybe provide the link to the public recipe. Oh yeah, that would rock. Of course it also might usher in a swarm of recipes that vary only slightly, like one ingredient off by 0.01%. Seems for whatever reason these folks publish a copied recipe, they will still do it even if it means changing it slightly.

2 Likes

I was looking for how to share privates with friends earilier.

wait…

private “recipes”, lol.

Yea, I just guessed that some peoples defaults were to off since there was so much junk out there.

One step ahead of the game @daath, interested to see the results of our new filing system.

1 Like

I know… Recipes are private by default anyway… :confused:

Maybe a couple of radio button alongside the Save button, that at least one has to be highlighted before you can save it, with say something along the lines of “is this an original recipe” or a “copy of”? if original selected it gets published if copy it stays private by default?

A bit like, it won’t let you purchase something at an online store radio button, till you have clicked I have read the T&C’s first button

I think the “share private recipies with friends” doesn’t work for example for vape shop owners who want to link their “My recipes” page so that customers know what they can make.

1 Like

This is something that’s confused me for quite a while. The application of the chosen terminology.

To me, copy means just that. All aspects of the recipe should be transferred as a whole, into “my recipe database”. Now if that’s the way it works great! But I don’t remember seeing a “Copy” button. I just learned to ‘abuse the favorite button’ as a result. So the only recipe in my “box” is the one I manually entered.

But then when I read daath’s statement above, I go right back to being confused. I’ve never been able to make sense of (or use, as a result of) the whole copy/adapt thing. “the adapted, unchanged version” is not an adaptation if nothing has been changed. It’s a copy, and until it’s adapted (changed) it should absolutely be private, and I would take that one step further, and make sure there way no way for the copy to be made public by the user. Again, until adapted.

As daath already knows, I’ve been a strong proponent for grouping/sorting/categorization features for months on end. But that’s more to @Grubby. :wink:

I also agree that the original author should get credit, not just the first to post. I like the idea above for a “dispute button” or such. For cases where the author decides to become part of the community. (IE: EJAB -my only ‘recipe’ thus far, or Wayne, as referenced above) I posted it in honor of the creator, and I think most do that. I’d consider it an even bigger honor to actually have that person be here and interacting, and expect them to want to take ownership.

5 Likes

You bring up an interesting point @Sprkslfly.

This still has the potential for abuse, but what about a “Copy to My Recipes” button which would copy (and keep private permanently, no option for public) a recipe to your ‘box’. Then, adjust the “adapt this” so that if nothing is changed, it can’t be saved at all. People could still abuse the adapt this by adapting and changing a % or a flavor brand or whatever, but it may help curb some of the dupes if people have to actually work a little more to make that happen instead of just clicking “Adapt”, unchecking a box, and saving it.

Overall, I like this new feature. I like that I can see at a glance and follow the trail to an original.

6 Likes

This would totally float my boat - that way the true author name would be kept, instead of it saying I’ve made something when all I’ve done is change the nic ratio :+1:

p.s. I don’t publish anything yet because I’m still learning :blush:

2 Likes

Or in the same vane. How about a copy protect button. Which means that you now own that recipe (of course that recipe and the exact percentages) SO you make a recipe. You love it and like it, it must have been rated by another user at least say 3 times. Then you get a button to copy protect it. You then take ownership of that recipe. People can adapt but not save it with the same percentages. The system will say “Save to favourites?” and not let you adapt unless you change it.

Just throwin out ideas now.

The problem with just saving a recipe to favorites is if the person changes it or deletes it or makes it private, you’re up a creek unless you wrote it down somewhere else. Copying it to your own recipes ensures you’ll always have it, and I like that option.

Like @Lolly said, it would kinda be nice to have the ability to distinguish between recipes you created and ones that were simply copied from someone else. Some way to preserve the original author but still have your own copy. I usually adapt and just put the originators name in the title. Always keep private unless I’ve changed something and either it makes it a different recipe or I think others might get some use out of seeing how I’ve adapted something.

5 Likes

Sounds reasonable. I agree on not posting a copied recipe publicly unless a specific purpose as you said.

1 Like