Like the woman suing McDonalds because her coffee was hot.
Donât all these products come with big warning signs that it contains the highly addictive substance of nicotine? What more do they expect?
But I do see what Juul did here, very smart fellows there. They lower the nic from 5% to 3%, a 40% reduction. This will result directly in users buying more pods (lower nicotine level, the more you vape - generally speaking). Theyâre going to see quite a profit boost from all this ânegativeâ advertising 
GreatâŚGive the ambulance chasers another target, soon to be followed by more legislators screaming about âThuh chidrunz!!!11!!!â and even more onerous laws that do nothing but fill the stateâs coffers.
Lol. Itâs more like people during McDonalds for obesity. (I can say this because I go there once every two months for two McDoubles or I call it two chemical cheese burgers lol )
Juul getting more heat in the UK too
Does Juul offer a 0 nic version? If so, case closed, no amount of looking cool is compelling people to use the version with nic. If not, then shame on them, they should. Not to say they should be sued over it, people still know full well that nic is addictive. Most kids who start smoking, itâs to look cool or fit in, they know damn well what the risks are and chose to do it anyway. With vaping the health risks are less documented but the issue of nic being addictive is practically common knowledge.
Also, stop using the McDonaldâs Coffee suit as an example of frivolous suits. The details of that case are a lot more egregious than the mainstream media represents it and after all, isnât that the same misinformation game theyâre trying on us?
I wouldnât at all be surprised if these âvapersâ are paid shills for big tobacco or some lobbyist groups, with the sole intention of the end result being litigation and negative exposure. Iâm not a tinfoil hatist but I would not be surprised to learn that at all.
Yup. I couldnât agree more. When I am driving sometimes I need to put my McDouble between my legs because I need to read a txt. It burns for sure. But I donât sue.
Yes of course, 88°C (190°F) coffee is definitely a case to sue a company for $2.86M. When I make my coffee, I use boiling (100°C) water⌠who wouldâve thought that coffee could be hot? What details am I missing??? 
Welcome to the land of the lawsuits!
What is there to educate?
She bought hot coffee (the one I make is still hotter), she spilled it because she opened the lid while squeezing the cup between her knees (very smart lady!) and she got 3rd degree burns (yeah, whaddaya want?).
Cases like this wouldnât even make it to court here. Itâs beyond ridiculous! I donât understand how someone can even defend the nature of this case, no matter how many times you try telling me I donât know the case.
And to me itâs very similar in nature that these idiots try suing Juul for supposedly addicting them to nicotine.
If you canât be bothered to read the real details of the actual court case, I canât help you. Itâs not my job to cure willful ignorance and God forbid we should derail a thread.
Oh I read the details of the case, thereâs zero ignorance here. Itâs still ridiculous.
Hmmmm. Moving back on topic!!! Lol. My bad.
Hereâs a twist. Iâm GLAD Jul is getting sued. Maybe they will make a step down system. Going from 40mg to 30mg to 20mg and so on. This is the number one reason why they wonât get a penny from me.
If someone whatâs to vape âxâ level of nicâŚthen great. I am all for that. But I truely believe a vast majority of people want to first replace the cigarette then cut back to a level (whatever that may be) until their happy.
The way I see it, jul doesnât supportâŚwell I was going to say something elseâŚbut I want to say⌠for me is that they donât support my interest in reduction of nicotine dependence. (Whether that represents the greater vape consumer base to include those who have never seen a vape YouTube video or visited a site like elr ir not). One step further in line is Julâs desire is to only take you one step, get you as a customer and keep you there.
Does anyone know what 5% nicotene would be in milligrams ? Just curious how strong they acrually are ?
50mg/ml is 5%
That is too much, no wonder they are being sued