Earlier today, I noticed an unexpected comment on an in-development recipe of mine that I had not intended to be public. The comment was an auto-generated comment from the system, essentially saying that I was not using traditional ingredients from the ELR database. The recipe, called CoRY4-2 was an accidental public posting and contained ID numbers associated with the individual ingredients from the personal database I use to track and reference them. I just wanted to apologize to the forum and anyone who may have come across it and assure everyone that any intentional public postings of mine will use proper ingredients from the ELR database.
That’s a good point, I never even considered that before, but in retrospect, looking at ingredients it does show how many private recipes the ingredient is used in. Thanks for that reminder (and minor smackdown - well-deserved I might add.)
With my flavors in private recipes I annotate them as it works for me. I have several coffee and tobacco extractions along with some food grade extracts like cinnamon and orange that would be annotated with date, ingredients extracted and mfgr for my quick reference. One in particular is D&R Picayune tobacco a NET reading “DR Picayune 762018” That’s the mfgr, name, and date extracted.
I will be following you in hopes of seeing some of your considerable experience in recipe form!
@whosyourdaddy/@Benoz/@craigtalley/ - Thank you for the comments and interest. I must admit that I am a bit of a perfectionist while simultaneously never thinking anyone would like the stuff that I tend to take an interest in, but I have tweaked many recipes over the years that I enjoy, and some that I don’t so much but others claim addiction to. I will indeed start publishing some of them with a bit more regularity in the hopes that at a minimum those mixers who take an interest won’t have to endure the worst combinations possible as I’m fairly certain I found most of them in the first few years! (Hah)