OK, it’s coming together. I have to sign off… but whatever y’all come up with I’m all in.
That’s what they say here, check if your vape (web) shop is part of the advocacy movement, if not ask them why, if they don’t want to get involved, don’t buy from them.
1 Like
Here’s a taste of what we’re up against. Really, to me, there is no more egregious thing government can do than to call e-cigarettes tobacco products. That should be law suite # 1 in my opinion. Sure, if they want to use the verbiage so often heard that they will regulate them as they do tobacco products that’s one thing. But to label them a tobacco product - well that’s just re-defining something to suit an end game. As I said before, an e-cigarette is not a tobacco product just like a horse is not a motorcycle.
So, where it becomes especially dangerous (this definition of terms and misinformation) is when governments put outright lies into legislative works. Listen here…I started at this point of the podcast so as to take you right to it - https://soundcloud.com/casaa-media/casaa-03-08-15#t=1:28
I wish I had thought of it before I ordered this morning.
1 Like
What You Can Do
First and foremost, I urge you to join CASAA and
keep an eye on their calls to action. They are often among the first
to report when your rights are being threatened where you live. There
are many other vaping organizations you can support as well, including
the Vaping Militia (for personal rights), AVA (for businesses) and EFVI (if you are in Europe), to name just a few.
You can also take it upon yourself to contact your local
representatives and tell them how you feel about vaping, and make sure
they know that if they oppose vaping rights they will not get your
support or your vote.
You can also add positive Vaping media to social media sites
3 Likes
I’m pretty sure it won’t be your last order… 
1 Like
Talk about a load of crap, check this out…
http://www.thespectrum.com/story/news/local/2015/03/28/vaping-unknown-risk/70613058/
In the RTE Prime Time video, the man named Clive was the only one speaking straight and truthfully. That Darren and Kathleen are a couple of smug, condescending asswipes who, two years after the interview, perfectly portray the average idiot who speaks against vaping with their inane, uneducated and specious arguments. Good lord, at what point did the institutions of higher learning stop teaching about logical fallacies? Or do they really think everyone within earshot is just too stupid to see the holes in their arguments?
2 Likes
2 Likes
It has been dirty from the start, effing bastards and we get regulation based on fear instead of facts,
2 Likes
That’s the whole story. Even though the facts are starting to surface most people are stuck on the what if factor from the fear.
Even with the decline of smoking, vaping get little credit for that fact. They attach their meager efforts to vaping and say it’s all responsible for the decline.
People are quitting smoking in unheard of numbers and the FDA and CDC has nothing to do with it. Once the regulations go through the decline will cease and they will have accomplished their goals.
2 Likes
Yes, their goal of getting people smoking again and get the money flowing once more…
2 Likes
1 Like
4 Likes
I reposted this after 1 minute of viewing. My sentiments exactly…
3 Likes