"FDCA’s definition of “tobacco product” and suggested “that components and parts could include everything from coils and batteries to all the ingredients comprised in producing e-liquids (such as flavorings and vegetable glycerin) even if the product does not contain nicotine.”
4 Likes
I’m beyond fed up with these nanny-state politicians.
“Just relax, we’ll decide what’s best for you.”
6 Likes
As it stands, the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) defines “tobacco product” as “any product made or derived from tobacco that is intended for human consumption, including any component, part, or accessory of a tobacco product.” 21 U.S.C. § 321(rr)(1) (emphasis added). As the FDA concedes on its website, “it’s possible that a disposable, closed system device that contains an e-liquid with truly zero nicotine (or synthetic nicotine) would not be regulated by the FDA as a tobacco product.”
That said, there are other ways FDA might try to regulate synthetic nicotine, whether under its authority to regulate a “component” of a tobacco product or as a “drug.” In November, FDA Center for Tobacco Products Director Mitch Zeller discussed the “component” aspect of the FDCA’s definition of “tobacco product” and suggested “that components and parts could include everything from coils and batteries to all the ingredients comprised in producing e-liquids (such as flavorings and vegetable glycerin) even if the product does not contain nicotine.” He added, “That’s an assessment that we need to make on a case-by-case basis based upon the totality of all the information that we have.”
FDA could also seek to regulate synthetic nicotine as a drug. The FDCA defines drug, among other things, as “articles (other than food) intended to affect the structure or any function of the body.” 21 U.S.C. § 321(g)(1). To the extent synthetic nicotine is intended to affect a consumer’s body, FDA could attempt to assert jurisdiction. Indeed, in the 1990s, FDA tried to regulate nicotine as a “drug” and cigarettes and smokeless tobacco as “drug delivery devices.” The Supreme Court in FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. found FDA lacked such authority, but one of the Court’s key findings was that Congress had passed “tobacco-specific legislation [that] effectively ratified the FDA’s previous position that it lacks jurisdiction to regulate tobacco.” Today, things are different. The 2009 Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act gave FDA the authority to regulate tobacco products. Should FDA regulate synthetic nicotine as a drug today, it could point to recent legislation from Congress giving FDA a role in this space more broadly. So far, however, FDA has not taken this approach.
3 Likes
Is synthetic Nicotine “Made from or derived from” Tobacco? We need a chemist to chime in. Nicotine is not Tobacco by literary definition but Tobacco contains Nicotine naturally. I’m not sure how one can claim Synthetic Nicotine as being “derived” from Tobacco and I’m fairly certain you don’t need Tobacco to produce Synthetic Nicotine.
5 Likes
Here ya go: NN Syntha - Synthetic Nicotine - Now Available
" Nude Nicotine’s Synthetic Nicotine, has been prepared in the laboratory and does not come from tobacco. That’s correct – nicotine, that is TRULY TOBACCO FREE!
Our ‘Syntha” Synthetic Nicotine is constructed in the laboratory from pyrrolidine and pyridine backbone chemistries, then further purified by chromatography, followed by a final distillation step."
7 Likes